Change Failure Rate: How to Measure and Lower It

Change Failure Rate: How to Measure and Lower It

1. Definition: What CFR Is and How It’s Calculated

For engineering leaders, change failure rate (CFR) goes beyond mere statistics; it’s a direct indicator of your team’s operational resilience and delivery maturity. In simplest terms, CFR is the percentage of changes introduced into production that lead to failureswhether that’s downtime, performance degradation, or urgent patches.

  • DORA Change Failure Rate: This term originates from the DevOps Research and Assessment group, which also popularized lead time, deployment frequency, and MTTR as key DevOps metrics.
  • Change Fail Rate: A shorter, colloquial reference to the same concept.

Leadership Perspective:

  • A high CFR ties up senior engineers in firefighting rather than innovation.
  • A low CFR signals consistent deployments and a healthier DevOps culture, allowing engineering leaders to focus on roadmap execution, strategic planning, and growth initiatives.

2. Why It Matters: Effects on Reliability and User Satisfaction

  1. Reliability & System Uptime
    Each failed change can result in unplanned outages or performance hiccups. Fewer outages mean less customer churn, fewer SLA penalties, and more predictability in operational costs.
  2. User Satisfaction & Market Reputation
    Frequent rollbacks or production incidents damage customer trustespecially if you’re offering mission-critical services.High reliability can be a competitive advantage, reinforcing your brand as stable and dependable.
  3. Team Morale & Engineering Throughput
    Constant failures drain morale, especially if the same issues keep recurring. A stable pipeline means engineers spend less time on post-mortems and more on strategic, revenue-driving features.

3. How to Measure: Formula and Tools

Clarify “Failed Change”

  • Define Failure Criteria: For some organizations, a “fail” might only be a full rollback. Others track partial degradations or urgent patches. Ensure clarity across teams so everyone agrees on the same benchmarks.

Data Collection & Analysis

  • Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) Dashboards
    Tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions, or Azure DevOps automatically record deployment events. Tag each deployment as “successful” or “failed” to build your CFR data set.
  • Incident Tracking
    Link incidents in platforms like Jira, ServiceNow, or PagerDuty to specific releases, so you can quickly trace the cause and effect of a failed deployment.
  • Monitoring & Alerting
    Solutions like Datadog, Splunk, or New Relic detect performance dips post-deployment, flagging potential partial failures that might otherwise go unnoticed.

Leadership Tip: Establish a monthly or quarterly review of CFR alongside other DORA metrics (e.g., deployment frequency, MTTR) to drive executive buy-in for resource allocation and process improvements. High performing engineering teams rely on DevDynamics for tracking DORA metrics.


4. Best Practices: Automated Testing, CI, Code Reviews

Lowering the change failure rate isn’t just about “testing more”it’s about building quality into every step of the development lifecycle, aligning teams, and ensuring clear ownership.

Automated Testing & Quality Gates

  • Shift-Left Testing: Start with unit tests in the dev environment, progress to integration and end-to-end tests as code moves closer to production.
  • CI Pipelines: Mandate that all merges pass automated quality checkslike code scans, security audits, and performance thresholdsbefore shipping.

Continuous Integration (CI) with Frequent Merges

  • Small Batch Sizes: Large code merges often lead to complex failures, making them harder to fix. Encourage frequent, smaller merges to catch issues earlier and reduce change fail rate.
  • Trunk-Based Development: Minimizes branching complexity, helping teams maintain a steady flow of integration.

Peer Reviews & Pairing

  • Pull Requests: Mandate at least one senior engineer review every PR for architectural alignment and potential pitfalls.
  • Pair Programming: Can be especially effective for critical changes, ensuring knowledge transfer and reducing siloed code ownership.

Deployment Strategies

  • Canary Releases: Roll out changes to a small user subset or region first. If failures spike, roll back quickly with minimal impact.
  • Feature Flags: Toggle features on/off without a full redeploy, isolating new code until it’s proven stable.
Fewer failures mean less post-incident chaos, improved developer morale, and more consistent velocity on the product roadmap.

6. Conclusion

Reducing the change failure rate isn’t just a technical challengeit’s a leadership imperative that impacts budget efficiency, market perception, and engineering morale. By clarifying failure criteria, investing in automated testing, and tightening DevOps collaboration, you can significantly lower the dora change failure rate while boosting overall software quality.

Next Steps:

  • Dive deeper into our DORA Metrics Hub to see how deployment frequency, mean time to recovery (MTTR), and lead time for changes all intersect with CFR.
  • Download our CFR Reduction Checklistan executive-oriented guide for rolling out best practices and measuring ROI (link or CTA).
  • Share your insights or questions on change fail rate: How have you tackled failures in production, and what results have you seen from process changes?

By keeping a pulse on change failure rate alongside other DevOps performance metrics, you set your engineering organization up for resilience, innovation, and ongoing success.


This blog post is part of our Ultimate Guide to DORA Metrics Series, aimed at engineering managers and technical executives who seek data-driven DevOps strategies. Check the series for deeper insights into leading engineering practices, including advanced CI/CD techniques and organizational transformations.

See How Top Engineering Teams Improve
Developer Productivity